Jon Meerdink: Really pay attention to Paul’s point about getting to Tom Brady They just have to make sure they do it again. The Packers have already done what they need to do to beat Tampa Bay. You can take advantage of this aggressiveness through the standard motions and RPO elements Green Bay routinely uses. Tampa Bay struggles defending against play-action as their linebackers can get overaggressive. The “illusion of complexity” is the fancy term he likes to use, but really it’s all about finding stress points in the defense. On offense, creating difficult choices for the defense is the primary goal of the LaFleur offense. Particularly if Green Bay goes with single-high looks, unleashing Savage in a robber role could pay dividends if the pressure is strong enough. He lacks the mobility to be a running threat, negating the big disadvantage of man coverage. Brady, like any quarterback, struggles under pressure. A similar gameplan should take shape this week. When Green Bay jammed up the receivers and gave the pass rush more time to get home, they destroyed the Rams passing game. This has been the primary complaint with the Pettine defense for a long time. The best portions on defense in the Rams game were when the Packers stopped letting Goff dictate the terms of engagement by playing softer zones. Rcon14: Copy-Paste the Best Parts from the Rams Game Be aggressive, get the ball, and if he hits a random bomb to Chris Godwin, be content in the fact that Aaron gets the ball back more quickly. In four of them, Brady threw multiple picks. Being beat by a Brady bomb is infinitely preferable to letting him dink and dunk you for 10 plays at a time, and it is the risk you must accept to stop their offense. Some coaches don’t do this because it does open you up to the occasional high-profile deep shot that will lead SportsCenter and make you look bad. Play an aggressive press man, take away his quick short throws, and give your pass rush time to get home and hit the old man. The recipe against Brady is pretty simple. Hopefully, with that game under their belt and a season’s worth of tape to study, the Bucs won’t be quite so adept, and the Packers’ plan will eliminate those mistakes, But if they do happen, you can’t go to pieces. Aaron and Matt LaFleur need to accept that such a thing may happen, but remember that in order to move the ball and score points, you still have to stick to the scheme. The fact is, the Packers were humming along on offense until that happened, and fell apart after. The second pick was more about bad luck, but it did not help matters. From that point on he was gun shy about trusting his reads, he held the ball too long, and he got hit. In their last meeting, Aaron threw a pick-six because he read the rush and coverage wrong. The first is to understand that Todd Bowles may fool you occasionally, and this may even have catastrophic results, but that doesn’t mean you should change your gameplan.
There are two risk propositions you face against Tampa, and Green Bay came up on the wrong side of both in game one. What’s your take? How do you think the Packers need to play to beat the Buccaneers? Paul Noonan: Accept small risks for big gains. We asked our writers what strategy they’d prefer to see if the Packers are indeed going to beat the Buccaneers, and the answers all seemed remarkably similar. The Packers are a game from the Super Bowl, and all they have to do to make their second trip to the Big Game in the Rodgers era is to defeat Tom Brady and the Tampa Bay Buccaneers.
0 kommentar(er)
